Washington Post via Mike Church
""Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke warned Wednesday that Americans  may have to accept higher taxes or changes in cherished entitlements  such as Medicare and Social Security if the nation is to avoid  staggering budget deficits that threaten to choke off economic growth."
"Bernanke did not endorse any particular approach to reducing the  deficit. But he laid out the "difficult choices."
"To avoid large and ultimately unsustainable budget deficits, the nation  will ultimately have to choose among higher taxes, modifications to  entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, less spending  on everything else from education to defense, or some combination of  the above," he said"
"His remarks highlighted the difficulties posed by funding these  entitlement programs over the long term. With the population aging and  medical costs rising faster than inflation, Medicare is set to become a  major drain on the federal budget in the coming decades, though the  recently passed health-care bill has delayed the date when the program  will begin to require big infusions of cash." 
"Social Security is already draining resources from the broader federal  budget, as spending on benefits has risen above this year's Social  Security tax collections. While that gap is expected to be fleeting, the  program, the largest single item in the federal budget, is projected to  require sustained support within the next 10 years."
"Obama has said he expects the commission [The presidentially appointed Commission on  Fiscal Responsibility and Reform]  to look at all options for  reining in deficits, including cuts to entitlement programs, reductions  in other spending and tax increases."
 "On Tuesday, White House adviser Paul A. Volcker spoke in favor of higher  taxes, telling an audience at a New York Historical Society event that  the nation may have to consider a European-style sales tax, known as a  value-added tax, to close the persistent budget gap."
____________________
So, wow, you mean when more and more programs are added (don't forget the wages of everyone handling the programs and all the other related costs such as offices, buildings, paper work, etc etc etc), they need more tax dollars to run them? Shocking!
 
This situation has been coming for a long time and is a good example of what happens when you continually add social entitlement programs without ever examining and eliminating programs that are outdated and no longer pertinent to today's society. You cannot continue to tax a smaller and smaller portion of the public to sustain an ever growing percentage of the population that is no longer adding to the output of the country. Eventually the load on those carrying the burden of support becomes too much to bear and the system will collapse.
ReplyDeleteI wasn't going to say anything until after the fact, but ObamaCare has guaranteed Cap and tax becomes a reality. There is no other way to pay for all this spending. I was hoping they would defeat it on its own, but if I started talking about new carbon taxes to pay for universal health care it would just get the eco-nuts on side. Its all moot till 2012 now anyway.
ReplyDeleteDuh - the Demos are like our Libranos - they do not get that social programs require theft.
ReplyDelete